Indian Threat : Mumbai Terrorism: Beyond Official Story-V

By Dr. Abdul Ruff
People do object to foreign invasions and occupation of their lands and it is for the “civilized’ world to take measure to vacate the lands occupied by them, their allies or friends.. Kashmiris have been demanding independence back from India . Of late USA and UN have pressed Indian to submit to international pressure on Kashmir and consider surrendering sovereignty back to Kashmir . India now seeks some relief on that account under terrorism plank. India is taking advantage of the situation and playing his own game to get maximum benefit of the situation. The investigators say the aim was to “create an international incident, and anything big in Mumbai would be noticed all over the world”.
In other words, the burden of the delay tactics was to bring the incident look similar or at least closer to Sept11. The hold of the terrorists for three days after the terrorism, their modus operandi, their links, determination all lead to questions which remain unanswered. The Indian scheming are focused on to enable India to come closer to USA as strategic partner under terror wars category. The full investigations might lead to some clues or answers but as already seen that such incidents when happened the investigations were never disclosed if there are insiders involved. A deep sympathy India sought for being a “terror victim’ has been pronounced all over the world, along with for those who died.
As it is known, Pakistan wants 3 Indians for their criminal activities: Advani, Purohit, and Thackeray. However, list is longer than this. Not just these three persons, in fact many people in New Delhi ’s big offices should be on the “wanted” list of UN as well. Indian brute forces have been murdering innocent and defenseless Kashmir since 1947 when Indian quite tactfully annexed its neighboring Jammu Kashmir. All those responsible for the genocides in Kashmir ought to be in a wanted list. India wants to outsmart Pakistan with its own hit-list.
So, India now demands Pakistan to hand over 40 “terrorists”- a revised estimate from its earlier 20 odd- and New Delhi ’s further action would depend on how Islamabad responds. India says Pakistan must surrender some 40 wanted by India on some other cases. It looks sheer joke on Indian part. India claims that the terrorist bosses abroad had a target of 5000 people and the achievement was negligible and no one gives the clues about how and from whom this information has reached the Indian media. Indian terrorism specialists claim evidence is with Pakistan and it should be fetched and not to do Pakistan ’s job; after all Pakistan and other neighbors are expected to India ’s job and not other wise.
Already economically haunted, the Muslims have been facing tough situations around the world on account of the fabricated ‘terrorism’ reports by the global media abetted by the intelligence wings. The anti-Islamic agenda in conjunction with anti-Pakistan-cum-Kashmir goals has stood Hindu India in good stead and blame for all terrorism activities perpetuated by the state agencies and Hindu outfits have been cunningly placed on the defenseless Muslims in India and Kashmir as well the “cross-border-terrorists’ from Pakistan. India media over decades have created a terror image about Muslims around and pleaded with the UN and USA for the total “innocence of Hindustan ” and had asked the world to treat the Muslims as potential terrorists.
Several national and international sources have disclosed that Indian-Hindu politicians of India provide logistical and financial support to terrorists. Hindu Jihads might get hold of New Delhi ’s nukes to destroy the remaining mosques and other Islamic monuments. Terror prone India should be a cause of concern to its neighbors, especially Pakistan , Bangladesh , Sri Lanka and obviously Kashmir . There has been a persistent propaganda that Pakistani nukes are not safe and one day might get into hands of terrorists ,But what happened in Mumbai onNov26-28 has raised concerns about security of Indian nuclear assets. It has become a global practice to win elections by employing unjustifiable methods, including wars and terrorism, missile firings, etc and it has been proved that the ruling party gains greatly form such nefarious efforts to influence the voters.
With articles made-to-order on Mumbai terrorism, Indian media somehow hinted the political cause or the poll climate as the possible reason for the Mumbai terrorism and therefore, the England team came back and both India and UK have resumed their cricket game even as the poll game ended with none getting any special mileage from the terrorism. The reports that India took special care not to get the English cricketers killed in the bombings because, possibly, they are the guests of the Indian state and any disaster would have serious consequences for Indian diplomacy especially in the West when it is trying to knock at every large doors in the Western capitals to get endorsements for UNSC seat on account of terrorism experience and being a terror “victim”.
India said the “terrorists” from Pakistan had a target of 5000 persons in Mumbai alone. India said its interrogation of the surviving terrorist indicates that all 10 men come from the Pakistani port of Karachi , and at least one, if not all 10, were Pakistani nationals. Indian wants to see the image of Pakistan gets damaged/weakened in the US and West. As a serious “victim” of terror, India expects to be preferred as their major terror ally of USA and not Pakistan . With different statements and approaching the international forums India can build a psychological pressure on both Pakistan and USA . As an ally to kill Muslims, Pakistan Army is already busy in tribal areas and Balochistan. They are going to worry about eastern borders. Now India would add more problems to Pakistan viz a viz USA .
India eagerly waits for opportunities to stall Indo-Pak peace talks and delay the Kashmir re-independence issue .While any number of terrorist attacks in Pakistan tearing apart that Islamic nation, Pakistan still wants to forge good neighborly relations with India , while any such terrorism in India would immediate call for closing any peace process abruptly. It is because India has to surrender Kashmir under its brute control since 1947 and it wants to retain their control over that nation by scuttling any positive development in the talks and hence the recent peace talks in New Delhi between foreign ministers of Pakistan and India were called off after the Mumbai terrorism.
Indian paper tiger would not attack Pakistan for sure. However, since both are nuclear nations, terrorism of this proportion is bound to elicit devastating consequences for their ties and also for the whole region. Considering that the Taj terror was essentially meant for boosting the recent poll in 5 states, and it had nothing to do with UNSC or non-NATO ally-ship, India is not expected to create another false alarm in Pakistan with a possible war. Two jets were shot down during the Kargil conflict in 1999 under similar situation.
Pakistan wants to help India if it the Indians are sincere and produce credible evidence. At the same time, any reading of the Pakistani English-language press reveals Pakistani voices expressing real anguish and horror over this incident.’ the prominent Karachi-based feminist poet and writer Attiya Dawood: ‘I can’t say whether Pakistan is involved or not, but whoever is involved, it is not the ordinary people of Pakistan, like myself, or my daughters. We are with our Indian brothers and sisters in their pain and sorrow.’ Pakistan ’s information minister confirmed the incursion and said officials had “spoken to the Indian air force and they have said it was inadvertent”. The director of public relations for the Pakistan Air Force (PAF) said the Indian aircraft had violated Pakistani airspace on two separate occasions.
Kashmir remians the root cause of tensions between Pakistan and India and main cause for terrorism. The Indian strategist expect, rather want, the Mumbai violence to adversely affect Pakistan and India relations, Indian government is busy in stressing the point that some outsiders have committed the terrorism. Anti-terror law would terrorize the innocent Kashmiris and Muslims in general further. However, India accepts only praises and does not accept any responsibility for intra- terrorism in the country; does not even hint at its role in terrorism either in Pakistan or Sri Lanka or India but conveniently pass on to Pakistan as a safe goat. Indian strategists know for certain any terrorist action in India would affect its relations with Pakistan and that has indeed happened, or at least is happening now.
(Concluded)
About Me/ email 


Chootiya
just bull shit article
ignorance is bliss. thats how islam got this big. by getting married to teddy bear playing girls by their prophet
If after reading all this one can still honestly say or accept that it is an article written by an Indian national then either there is something wrong with this blog or we have to change the lexicons.
dear Rajiv sir, I haven’t read this particular article…but if you’d ask me, I’d say there is something wrong with the whole world…American and Soviet policies Cold War created Al Qeada and Talibanism…Increasing Talibanism in Pakistan and failure in sorting out Indo-Pak relations seems to be creating what Dr. Abdul calls ‘Hindu Al Quaeda’ in India… Dr. Abdul no longer sends his articles to this blog…perhaps he too thinks something is wrong with this blog…i see more trouble in this region… instead of accusing others, I think, all nations need to introspect their policies…just as Obama says that America would now work toward ‘de-nuclearization’ policies…
Look dear, my point always has been that it is not that India is a perfect country ; only Utopia is ! But, I definitely feel that a true national can never spew such poison against his OWN country. Yes, he can criticise the policies, the leaders, whatever ……… But to just keep harping on & on that India is bad – that too only Indian Hindus are bad and that Pakistan is only an aggrieved party – now that is too much to digest. Especially now, when pakistan stands to be divided for a third time – possibly in to a hundred pieces.
I wanted to say that an Indian cannot write all this so if he says that he is an Indian staying in New Delhi, it sounds somewhat impossible because if he was, and Indian Hindus are the sort of butchers he makes them sound to be, they would never have left hime alive !!!
Our sympathies are with the “normal” citizens of that country ; the diehards have managed to make it a truly terrorist nation where the sane few are now left in a minority. You would have read about the public flogging of a young girl there. And the incident in Iran ? Is that something sane people can do ? If they were truly normal human beings they would have flogged the man in question simultaneously. Their laws are such that in all such cases (like rape, promiscuity etc) it is the woman in question who is punished – why is the man left out. They ensure that the whole world points fingers at them , they react by terror attacks and then they expect to be “accepted”. And they call it a religion of peace, As I ‘ve sais earlier, their misfits and unemployeds have given Islam a bad name else it would have been a wonderful religion.
In India its the same. I am a Hindu. The staunch Hindus – rather the same publicity seeking politicians or joblessHindus too turn into “savers of the faith”. They beat up girls when they see them walking with boys. At night they’ll go & rape females themselves (like the Muslim militants in Kashmir or elsewhere).
The Indian Hindu was never like this. Till the Muslim militants started all this. Yes, the average Indian walking in the street is not a morally good person. But, that holds for ALL Indians – Christians & Sikhs alike. They’ll pinch a girl in the bus, ogle at them in the market, break queues everywhere & so on………. It’s not confined to Indian Hindus. If only Hindus were bad, then what about Nepal where you hold Hinduism as the main religion ? Can we honestly say that all Nepalis are bad ? I dont think so.
So, although I don’t like what’s happening in my country I come out openly and say so and we look for solutions to get rid of our corrupt politicians. But I just dont go about throwing diatribes against just one class or religion.
In any case, as you agree I’m sure, its now all over the world. We live in a planet where no one is safe. Its no longer a GOOD place to live in. Tell me one country where one can live happily without such problems. we can either view it objectively and in a positive fashion or we can just keep blaming one particular caste / creed for all the ills in the world.
All said and done, the fact remains that at this time in history Muslims are one (or both) of the two protagonists involved in each and every scrap in the world.
So far as your blog is concerned, I can only request that some amount of restraint is necessary – even on people shouting against the so called Indian Muslim Doctor. They use vile language which you allow to be published. As a keeper of the blog you owe it to the world at large to maintain some dignity, some decorum. Some basic etiquettes must be observed if you want this to remain a good blog.
Dear Rajiv sir, Just like Dr. Abdul takes everything “religiously”, i think you make every point from the view of “Nationality”…my understanding is that things are not quite that clear cut in today’s multicultural world…Regarding your question on Nepalis, i can’t say Nepalis are any better or worse that any other people on earth…. moreover Nepal can not remain immune from what happens in India…I don’t know whether I’m doing things the right way or not…but as a keeper of this blog, I’m neither supporting Dr. Abdul nor his opponents, “vile” or otherwise… I just wish people realized how one action creates multiple reactions…and how futile is our self-righteousness…with a hope that may be that’d help us to understand the social dynamics of the society we’re living in… regards,
Subject: Oz contribution to the world!!!! Topic: Topic 6 Tools of Counter-Terrorism
Author: RANJIT RANA Date: 14 April 2008 8:58 AM
International Counter-Terrorism
The Australian Government is cooperating closely with key partners, particularly in South-East Asia, to bring terrorists to justice and to prevent further terrorist attacks. Australia’s substantial international counter-terrorism efforts, which include capacity building assistance and information sharing, are focused on law enforcement, intelligence, border and transport security, diplomacy, defence, terrorist financing, legal capacity, countering the threat of chemical, biological, radiological and nuclear terrorism, and promoting inter-faith understanding.
Key elements of Australia’s international counter-terrorism efforts include:
Bilateral engagement, particularly in South-East Asia and through our 13 counter-terrorism memorandum of understandings with Indonesia, the Philippines, Malaysia, Cambodia, Thailand, Brunei, Fiji, Papua New Guinea, East Timor, India, Pakistan, Afghanistan and Turkey
Multilateral engagement in forums such as the UN, ASEAN, ARF, APEC, PIF and CTAG, as well as in issue-specific groups such as the Global Initiative to Combat Nuclear Terrorism
Initiatives such as the Bali Regional Ministerial Meeting on Counter-Terrorism (February 2004) and the Sub-Regional Ministerial Meeting on Counter-Terrorism (March 2007)
Cooperation and coordination with other key partners and capacity building donors, such as the US, UK, Japan and the EU
Enhanced engagement with Australian academia and the private sector.
The Department’s Counter-Terrorism Role
Ensure a comprehensive and integrated policy approach to combatting terrorism internationally and in facilitating cooperation between Australian agencies and their counterparts in other countries on counter-terrorism issues
Support and coordinate the international counter-terrorism capacity building initiatives of Australian agencies, including through management of the inter-departmental International Counter-Terrorism Coordination Group
Monitor and respond as appropriate to international terrorism developments
Coordinate and promote activities to counter the threat of chemical, biological, radiological and nuclear terrorism
Engage in international interfaith outreach activities
Administer legislative arrangements for freezing terrorists’ assets
Advise Australians resident and travelling overseas and Australian businesses about terrorism-related security threats
Ensure the security and integrity of Australia’s passport issuing system
Ensure the security of Australian embassies and consulates abroad
Liaise with foreign diplomats and consular missions in Australia, and with relevant Australian agencies, with respect to the protection of those missions and other premises and visiting foreign dignitaries.
Dealings with Terrorists – Australia’s international obligations
What Australians and Australian businesses need to know
To meet Australia’s international obligations under United Nations Security Council Resolutions 1267 and 1373 to freeze the assets of terrorists, the Government has passed laws that make it a criminal offence to hold assets that are owned or controlled by terrorist organisations or individuals, or to make assets available to them, punishable by up to five years imprisonment. DFAT maintains a Consolidated List of individuals and groups to which this terrorist asset freezing regime is applications. Currently there are over 540 individuals and groups listed.
More information on Australia’s terrorist asset freezing regime.
DFAT maintains close contacts with Australia’s financial sector to ensure asset freezing arrangements take account of the sector’s legitimate interests. Australian businesses, in particular exporters, should also be aware that it is their responsibility to ensure that they do not do businesses with an individual or groups listed on the Consolidated List.
In addition to the Consolidated List, the Australian Government also maintains a list of groups that are proscribed as terrorist organisations under the Criminal Code. Go to the National Security Australia website to view the Criminal Code list of ‘terrorist organisations’. If a group is listed as a ‘terrorist organisation’ it is an offence to:
direct the activities of the organisation
recruit persons to the organisation
receive training from or provide training to the organisation
receive funds from or make available funds to the organisation
provide support or resources to the organisation
Links
Other Australian Government Departments
National Security Hotline (1800 123 400)
Attorney-General’s Department
Australian Customs Service
Australian Federal Police (AFP)
Australian Security Intelligence Organisation (ASIO)
Australian Transactions and Reports Analysis Centre (AUSTRAC)
Department of Defence
Department of Immigration and Citizenship (DIAC)
Department of Transport and Regional Services (DOTARS)
Protective Security Coordination Centre (PSCC)
External Sites
UN Action Against Terrorism
Asia-Pacific Economic Cooperation (APEC) Forum Counter-Terrorism Task Force
Association of South-East Asian Nations (ASEAN) Transnational Crime and International Terrorism
ASEAN Regional Forum Documents
Building International Political Will and Capacity to Combat Terrorism – G8 Counter-Terrorism Action Group (CTAG)
Pacific Islands Forum Secretariat
Financial Action Task Force on Money Laundering
Asia-Pacific Group on Money Laundering
Other Resources
Sub-Regional Ministerial Conference on Counter-Terrorism
Bali Regional Ministerial Meeting on Counter-Terrorism
Protecting Australia Against Terrorism 2006
Australia-ASEAN Joint Declaration for Cooperation to Combat International Terrorism, 1 July 2004
This article was written by Prince Colonel Dr. Ranjit Rana. This was used by Nina Gregurev.
Department of Foreign Affairs and Trade – Advancing the interests of Australia and Australians internationally.
R.G. Casey Building, John McEwen Crescent, Barton, ACT, 0221 Australia. Tel: +61 2 6261 1111 Fax: +61 2 6261 3111
Australian Offices: New South Wales, Northern Territory, Queensland, South Australia, Tasmania, Victoria, Western Australia
International Offices: Embassies, High Commissions, Consulates, Multilateral Missions and Representative Offices
ABN 47 065 634 525
Copyright | Disclaimer | Privacy
Messages in the thread Display Complete Thread
Name Author Date
Oz contribution to the world!!!! RANJIT RANA 14 April 2008 8:58 AM
Close this window
Dear abc,
Agreed. To a large extent.
BUT !
As a choice, religion is available to a person everywhere – Nationalities are not. One can practice his religion “nearly” all over the world whereas the Nation stays where it is. You can shout Allah -ho-Akbar from the rooftops from practically every country in the world ( although it may not be so easy to say Jai Shri Ram from anywhere in the same fashion – try doing it in Pakistan !!) Similarly, whereas it is possible to shout that Ghana is great or Egypt is great , or any other nation is great, this is possible either inside your own nation or possibly inside the UN assembly Hall. Elsewhere you have no choice but keep your nationalism to yourself while respecting that of the country you LIVE in.
I object to violence by militants / terrorists and its supporters anywhere but especially in MY country – naturally !
And yes, just as Nepal will not remain unaffected by happenings in India, similarly, how can we hope for peace in India when Pakistan is on the edge of disaster and the flowover will naturally enter India through the J&K areas ?
While you remain neutral and may not support / oppose anyone, I still maintain that its not a question of self-righteousness but one of maintaining a minimum decorum. I even accept the guise used by journalists today when they say that are only reporting the news – they are not responsible for it ; its a different matter that they will stand and videotape a suicide or a murder but raise no finger to even try and stop it. Which is why I mentioned that I was worried by the language used by people attacking the writings of the man in question (although they are only supporting my views).
I will repeat that the seriousness of anything is diluted once you let it go out of hand.
In any case, as you say, the person has already stopped writing – these comments continue to flow over old articles.
Meanwhile, yes, the world has changed a lot – mainly for the worse, but ultimately we will have to accept that it is a “global world”. The US is a land of immigrants yet you can sense the amount of hate they have for “new” immigrants. On a macro basis that is the same with all already-developed countries. The social dynamics of the society we are living in ensure that it is not yet multi-cultural to the extent of the acceptance of diversity, and that is possibly only when we manage to convince each other logically with discussions instead of trying to ram our ideas/beliefs down others’ throats.
Take care.
Dear Rajiv sir, thanks for considering me “neutral”, however, I think, I’ve my own views…as you too might have noticed in our conversation…i disagree with all sorts of religious and ideological fanaticism…and interestingly, Dr. Abdul also seems be keeping a watch on our conversation…he’s sent an article(posted today on this blog)…perhaps to inform that he’s not stopped writing…
… in fact I know, that he has been very active on the net through his articles on different websites, forums, and blogs…a simple google search of his name shows that…but what amuses me most is not his arguments or logic, but his passion and activism for his belief…and I wonder if we could persuade him to use his energy constructively…what i wish is that Dr. Abdul responded to the comments on his writings himself…for blogging is different from writing articles for papers…and readers expect prompt response and constant updates from blog authors…and comment authors are as important
as the main post authors…in fact, there’s no hierarchy in the blogging world…whether you write an article or main post or post your comments, all are called bloggers…and blogging is a discussion forum where everyone is expected to respond to the comments made on their writings…
Comment 6 above posted on April 13, 2009 by Ranjit Rana, pensioner and perpetual student, mentions both the name of my daughter: Nina Gregurev, and the following prefixes for Rana’s name: Prince Colonel Dr Ranjit Rana.
1. NINA GREGUREV NEVER USES THE INTERNET DUE TO CYBERSTALKER AND STALKER RANJIT SHAMSHER JUNG BAHADUR RANA’S HARASSMENT. see: http//dardagregurev.googlepages.com
2. Ranjit Rana was a PRIVATE in the Australian army and worked as a STOREMAN and was unemployed before and after that.
3. Ranjit Rana is DELUDED calling himself both COLONEL and DOCTOR. He has not completed any post-graduate degree and may not even have been able to finish his undergraduate degree. He is always in trouble with university lecturers, administrators, and fellow-students. He is NOT and NEVER WAS a COLONEL or anything but a very poorly motivated private who managed only a few brief months in the Australian Defence Force due to his severe mental health problems and extreme laziness and arrogance.
Subject: What is different about terrorism in 21st century? Topic: Topic 4 The Changing Characteristics Of Twenty-First Century Global Terrorism
Author: RANJIT RANA Date: 8 April 2008 7:19 AM used by Nina Gregurev
1. Religious terrorism use vulnerable Islamic women to be poor persons’ smart guided bomb. It is a sexed up thing for maximum slaughter though any IUDs (not tampoons)or improvised unidentified explosive devices.
2. Also secular left wing terrorists like Tamil Tiger where literacy rate is over 95% in the population; use effifminate gender or altruistic females to be poor persons’ smart guided IUDs for maximum impact of fear and publicity exploitation of the global media circus as some weird and wonderland special event.
3. The organisation of the terrorists are getting atomised, terrorists think now linearly, and they can communicate in virtual sense like from You Tube or social network via internet chat rooms and much more to craete instant mosque, provide lecture of beheadings and bomb makings and much more.
4. Deobandi Indian Sufism/mysticism like Benagli Hare Krishna cult (believe that absenting from sex one can allaow the flow of semen upwards for spiritual union of radha and Krishna ala androgyny with self like Ying and Tang in tantric sense) in alliance with Wahabi/Salafism where teaching is by the script. Theology practice is different like Zen Buddhism with that of Born agaisn Christian cum Tibetean Dalai Lama Buddhist california style. In sum, Tablighi Jamaat or the Preaching Party is globalising all Mulsim mosques locally, regionally and transnationally and further globally like McDonald Macca or Mecca’s for Muslims instantly as a sense of place for convinience, familiarity and for instant acces be it vityally 7* 24 or in bricks and mortar sense of reality. This means a pure play of virtual mosque like the virtual Swedish Embassy and also as bricks and mouse clicks in terms of accessibilty and usabilty.
I will stop here as I am using lots of electronic business marketing gargons.
Last edited on: 8 April 2008 8:35 AM
Messages in the thread Display Complete Thread
Name Author Date
What is different about terrorism in 21st century? RANJIT RANA 8 April 2008 7:19 AM
Close this window