Colombo SAARC Summit: An Over-view

By Abdul Ruff Colachal

All Heads of State and Government of the eight SAARC nations are expected to arrive in Sri Lanka to take part in the 15th SAARC Summit scheduled there for August 2 to 3. According to the available information, Nepal Prime Minister Girija Prasad Koirala will be the first to arrive in the island, followed by Bhutan Prime Minister Jigme Thinley. Bangladesh Chief Advisor Dr. Fakhruddin Ahmed and Maldives President Dr. Maumoon Abdul Gayoom will be in the country on August 1, while Prime Minister Dr. Manmohan Singh and Premier Yousuf Raza Gilani will participate in the Summit representing India and Pakistan respectively.  

Representing SAARCʼs youngest member Afghanistan, President Hamid Karzai will take part in the Summit, marking his countryʼs first participation at the regional event.

Besides, this yearʼs Summit will be observed by seven States, namely, China, the European Union (EU), Iran, Mauritius, Japan, Korea and the United States. The representatives of the Observer States who will take part in the main summit are Chinese Vice Minister of Foreign Affairs Wu Dawei, EU Director-Asia James Moran, Iranian Foreign Affairs Minister Monoucher Mottachi, Mauritius Minister of Agro Industries and Fisheries Dr. Arvin Bolell, Korean Vice foreign Minister Kwon Jong Rak and Assistant Secretary to the US Bureau of South and Central Asian Affairs Richard A. Boucher.  

SAARC 

Primarily focused on economic integration and integrated development in the region, the South Asian Association for Regional Cooperation (SAARC) was established on December 8, 1985 by eight countries in Southern Asia, namely India, Pakistan, Bangladesh, Sri Lanka, Nepal, Maldives Bhutan, and Afghanistan (2007) and, like ASEAN, D-8, and G8, etc., it is an economic and political organization forging ties with several international and regional forums.  

In the late 1970s, Bangladeshi President Ziaur Rahman proposed the creation of a trade bloc consisting of South Asian countries. SAARC was established to promote peace, stability, amity and progress in the region through strict adherence to the principles of the UN Charter and Non-Alignment, particularly respect for the principles of sovereign equality, territorial integrity, national independence, non-use of force and non-interference in the internal affairs of other States and peaceful settlement of all disputes. The idea of regional cooperation in South Asia was again mooted in May 1980. The Foreign Secretaries of the seven countries met for the first time in Colombo in April 1981. The Committee of the Whole, which met in Colombo in August 1981, identified five broad areas for regional cooperation. New areas of cooperation were added in the following years.  

SAARC was founded by the regional leaders conscious that in an increasingly interdependent world, the objectives of peace, freedom, social justice and economic prosperity are best achieved in the South Asian region by fostering mutual understanding, good neighborly relations and meaningful cooperation among the Member States which are bound by ties of history and culture. There are aware of the common problems, interests and aspirations of the peoples of SOUTH ASIA and the need for joint action and enhanced cooperation within their respective political and economic systems and cultural traditions. The SAARC Secretariat was established in Kathmandu on 16 January 1987 and was inaugurated by His Majesty King Birendra Bir Bikram Shah Dev of Nepal. Comprising the Foreign Ministers of Member States, the Council of Ministers is responsible for formulating policies, reviewing progress, deciding on new areas of cooperation, establishing additional mechanisms as deemed necessary, and deciding on other matters of general interest to the Association.  

The Declaration on South Asian Regional Cooperation was adopted by the Foreign Ministers in 1983 in New Delhi. During the meeting, the Ministers also launched the Integrated Program of Action (IPA) in nine agreed areas, namely, Agriculture, Rural Development, Telecommunications, Meteorology, Health and Population Activities, Transport, Postal Services, Science and Technology, and Sports, Arts and Culture. On August 2, 2006 the foreign ministers of the SAARC countries agreed in principle to grant observer status to the US, South Korea and the European Union. On 4 March 2007, Iran requested observer status. 

The Council meets normally twice a year and may also meet in extraordinary sessions by agreement of Member States. The Objectives of the Association as defined in the Charter are: * to promote the welfare of the peoples of South Asia and to improve their quality of life; * to accelerate economic growth, social progress and cultural development in the region and to provide all individuals the opportunity to live in dignity and to realize their full potential; * to promote and strengthen collective self-reliance among the countries of South Asia; * to contribute to mutual trust, understand and appreciation of one anotherʼs problem; * to promote active collaboration and mutual assistance in the economic, social, cultural, technical and scientific fields; to strengthen cooperation with other developing countries; * to strengthen cooperation among themselves in international forums on matters of common interest; and to cooperate with international and regional organizations with similar aims and purposes.  

Economic Cooperation 

 

Like the G8 and WTO, the SAARC is supposed to take collective corrective measures for economic development of the region. The key function of the SAARC is economic cooperation and collective decisions. The Committee of Economic Cooperation consists of Secretaries of Commerce of member states and it promotes regional cooperation in the economic field. The Agreement on SAARC Preferential Trading Arrangement (SAPTA) was signed in Dhaka during the 7th SAARC Summit, in 1993. It aims to promote and sustain mutual trade and the economic cooperation among the South Asian States, through exchanging concessions. Later, with the broad objective of moving towards a South Asian Economic Union (SAEU), the SAARC Member States signed the Agreement on SAARC Free Trade Area (SAFTA) on 6 January 2004 at the 12th SAARC Summit held in Islamabad and came into force on 1 January 2006. SAFTA has six core elements covering trade liberalization program, rules of origin, institutional arrangements, safeguard measures, special and differential treatment for least developed countries (LDCs), and dispute settlement mechanisms.

Sri Lanka would be assuming the Chairmanship of the most populated and one of the most endowed regional blocs in the world. The SAARC Summit in Colombo would certainly enhance the profile and the stature of Sri Lanka not only regionally but internationally, as stated earlier. The Chairmanship of the 15th SAARC Summit would reflect, with conviction and cogency, Sri Lankaʼs pro-active engagement and involvement with many a nations, and of course the largest regional bloc in the world. Taking the mantle of the Chair of the worldʼs largest regional grouping, in terms of population, Sri Lanka could be the focal point of all SAARC and SAARC related discussions and parleys. If addressed with a high degree of diligence, assiduousness and astuteness, the SAARC, similar to other well established regional groupings in the world, could articulate in unison with other groupings or international bodies. The political benefit of such an accomplishment would be monumental, particularly for Sri Lanka since it holds the Chair of the SAARC. 

The theme of Colombo SAARC Summit, the 15th SAARC Summit since its formation in 1985, is “SAARC Partnership for People”. The theme of the last year SAARC Summit held in New Delhi was “Connectivity”. The Southern leaders would deliberate on the issue of food security and power and energy.This theme has a close correlation and has a sense of continuity to the previous theme of connectivity. The SAARC Summit in Colombo would enhance the profile and the stature of the country not only regionally but internationally as well. 

Both these issues are most conspicuous to this developing region since the scarcity of power/energy and food could have a negative impact not only on the economies but on the populace as well. Key energy issues such as sharing of hydro power and the tri-lateral gas pipeline among Iran-Pakistan-India too would be addressed at the Colombo Summit. Addressing these issues at the Colombo Summit would definitely be of benefit to Sri Lanka.

Special focus would be on the price rise and oil crisis. India inssits on debating upon issues like “terrorism” and keeping in view of the latest “terror attacks” in India (at a time India was losing cricket in Sri Lanka), the SAARC would discuss the issue, including state terrorism.

Further, the assumption of the Chairmanship of this regional bloc, i.e., SAARC, would reflect the proactive engagement of Sri Lanka in geopolitical and geo-economics issues in the region, which in turn would transcend to Asia in particular and the rest of the world in general. The Chair of the SAARC would be indisputably one of the highest offices Sri Lanka has held over the years in international forums.  

Connectivity & The Host 

 

The SAARC member States are represented at Heads of State/Government level and would be accompanied by the Ministers of Foreign Affairs as well as several other key Ministers. International Summits of this nature and profile attending Heads of State/Government and senior Ministers would further strengthen political relations as well as economic and cultural relations. Over 250-300 foreign media personnel would be present at the Colombo Summit to extend coverage to the Summit as well as numerous meetings between the leaders among others.  

Sri Lanka places an increasing importance on establishing and reinforcing connectivity and closer and pro-active partnership between and among the member states as well as with other countries. It is anticipated that the Colombo Summit would focus on increasing connectivity not only air connectivity but by land and by sea as well. The utility of greater connectivity would be economically significant and would benefit Sri Lanka. The Connectivity and Partnership would lead to closer cooperation among the member States in many spheres such as trade, services, food security, tourism, oil and natural gas, and investments as well as FDI/FII among others.  

It is equally important for the member States and particularly for the Chair of the SAARC, which is to be Sri Lanka, to continue to establish and promote greater connectivity in all aspects. The theme of this yearʼs Summit, which is SAARC Partnership for People, would make a strong impingement on further development of the region.  

It is increasingly vital for the member States and particularly the imminent Chair of the SAARC, i.e., Sri Lanka, to play a pivotal and instrumental role, thus executing and fructifying the theme of Connectivity and the Colombo Summit theme of Partnership for People.  

Features

The region of SAARC has one of the highest number of people under the poverty line and the current development of the region is far from satisfactory. The concept of connectivity, as stated earlier, has a number of economic as well as political and social benefits to the member countries. SAARC is one of the weakest regional cooperation forums in the world as the actions for dis-connectivity take an upper-hand over even the normal process of collective organization. As a result, the intra- regional trade of the SAARC is still at a dismal figure of approximately 5.5% of the total trade of the member countries. Strong and well established degree of connectivity and partnership between and among people and member countries could increase the share of intra-regional trade markedly.  

As stated, the connectivity could lead to a great degree of economic and commercial activity such as enhancement of tourism, intra-regional investment and trade, international joint ventures and people to people contact among others. It is envisaged that the Colombo SAARC Summit would map out and deliberate other sources of alternative energy. Further, the Colombo Summit would focus on enhancing air connectivity between and among the member countries.  

The Summit will address the operational aspects and other concomitant dynamics of the SAFTA as well. The SAFTA could be the catalyst to transform and evolve the region of SAARC as a free trade area, thus increasing the bilateral and multilateral trade of goods.

It may also be stated that hosting a Summit with such a pantheon of South Asian leaders and other global dignitaries would reflect the stability, capacity and finesse of the country, thus stimulating economic and commercial activity. The Summit would also address the issue of establishing uniform standards of goods and services among the member countries. The standardisation would increase trade and reduce the cost of production as well as increase the competitiveness vis- a -vis other countries.  

It may be germane to state that the Summit would ponder over other methodologies to implement tele-medicine, visa free entry among the member States and facilitation of religious pilgrims among others. Needless to state that these economic initiatives and propositions would have a direct impact on the economic fabric of the country. 

It is no doubt that the Colombo SAARC Summit would lead to physical economic and commercial benefits to all member countries. The establishment of the SAARC University in New Delhi should benefit all the member countries in enhancing the human resource development and marketable skills and knowledge. The students entering the proposed SAARC University would be primarily from the member countries. The establishment of the SAARC Development Fund (SDF) which consists of US$ 300 million would be used for development purposes in all aspects. For any given country, particularly the member countries of SAARC, the human resource base would be of paramount significance and importance for the development and advancement of the respective countries. One could foresee that a development fund of this magnitude and scale would benefit most of the countries with regard to, particularly, the construction and advancement of their infrastructure.

It estimated that the total cost of the SAARC Summit in Colombo would be in the vicinity of SLR 2.8 billion or US$ 27 million. Compared to the importance of security at the recently held G-8 Summit in Japan, known as Hokkaido Summit, the cost of security alone was an exorbitant figure of USD 280 million.  

The newest member of the SAARC, which is Afghanistan, would offer increasing opportunity in the realm of construction and re-development. It may be noted that seven Observer States too would be engaged in bilateral discussions and would also focus on economic, trade and investment aspects as well. Given this context, one could comprehend the fact that these seven Observer States are not only affluent and economically and politically endowed but also belong to many regional and economic groupings.  

Bilateral Agreements among the member-states also would be clinched in the Summit or on the sidelines of it. Fo instance, it is slated that India and Sri Lanka would sign key agreements such as Science and Technology, National Thermal Power Corporation of India (NTPC) and CEB of Sri Lanka, and Power Grid Transmission Agreement.  

An Observation 

Shared power, energy, food and othe natual and humana resources can make wonders for the South Asian region gifted with plenety of them. But mutal suspeciaon and hatred have harmed the process of any urposeful cooeaton among the SAARC members.

SAARC leaders for over two decades keep meeting acheivng nothin tangible. At the beginning of the new millennium, hopes were kindled that SAARC countries would follow the lead provided by their neighbours of South East Asia and move fast to fill the void that was created by the colonialists and would help them come together through forging unity in matters related primarily to economic progress. Four years have passed since the signing of South Asia Free Trade Agreement (SAFTA) at the Islamabad SAARC Summit and various issues are still under discussion. But very slow forward movement was witnessed towards South Asia emerging as an economic union.

There are several issues that need concrete decisions and immediate follow-up action by the SAARC leaders. Of these, the first priority needed to provide uninterrupted, direct, and cheap communication links between the SAARC nations, either without the requirement of visa or liberal visa regime. Some SAARC countries already have this facility for their citizens that needs to be extended to all others. 

India should shelve the age-old practice of fusing terrirrm plank to keep itself away fom sahring collective responsiblity for economic revival of the region. Similarly, the restricted travel and goods transport facilities by cheaper modes like railways and road transport should be open to the citizens of all SAARC countries having their countriesʼ travel documents.It is strange that one cannot travel between Peshawar and Dacca while the same was possible about a century ago. 

SAARC has so far kept internal and bilateral issues outside its scope while its members and even the Summit leaders do make a mention in their official addresses. Sensitive internal issues with political implementations should continue to be dealt with separately while there are many an issue that were of immediate concern for the economic development of the region and its countries. US-Afghan and Sri Lankan officials also must have talked about the activities of Taliban and Tamil Tigers as they consider them to be “terrorist” bodies.

What makes our governments reluctant about opening up the travel facilities that would generate billions worth tourism between these countries who have so much to see and enjoy in each otherʼs country? And why should someone not drive in less than 48 hours from Kathmandu to Lahore and enjoy an overnight stay in some Indian city in the UP. Isnʼt it absurd that such a travel has turned into a dream in the post 1965 decades despite the establishment of SAARC?

Price risae? When some of the SAARC nations were facing staple grain shortage while some have surplus available. SAARC should save them of the exorbitant rates being charged by multinational corporations (MNCs)who have earned huge profits at the cost of developing countries whose markets they were pressing through the WTO to be opened for the imperial loot. Instead of opening the markets for MNCs, it would be in the interest of regional cooperation to open the same for countries in the region.

Regional cooperation among SAARC nations could do wonders with the development of electric power generation and the provision of alternate energy sources. It was not hydel and coal alone that could generate the required megawatts (MW) of electricity but there could be combined efforts to develop wind and solar energy. SAARC leaders need to demonstrate political will and restrain themselves from subverting mutual cooperation where it was beneficial for all.

Of course, there do exist genuine suspicions and fears on several issues. One would not expect an overnight change in the mindset of the decision-makers and even other sections of public who have lived their lives hating the neighbours more than others. This hate game is not only between adherents of different faiths but also amongst them. The feelings were easily discernable, say between India and Pakistan; India and Banladesh and India and Nepal and even amongst Pakistan and Afghanistan. There was no denying the fact that . But instead of nursing them while living with the same and looking ahead in future would be more desirable.

Need of the hour is a collective effort by all the countries of the region for relieving millions and millions of their citizens from poverty and deprivation that it accompanied. Among the member-states India seems to the strongest and richest and it has to shsulder prime responsiblity in keeping the SAARC well-knit and economically strong and coopeative. Issues like economic integration, combating terrorism and anti-Islamism should find thie duelace in the Summit. The regionʼs development and prosperity of its around one and a half billion people remains hostage to myopic forces of the status quo with the result that almost half of their population lives below the poverty line and points to a colossal waste of human resources.  

SAARC should consider influencing India to consider surendering sovereignty back to the struggling and dying Kashmirs. Kashmir should, in due course, join the SAARC as a bonafide member of SAARC to play a constructive role in the SAARC activities.  

It should be realized that there is no possibility of poverty alleviation or sustainable development or real people’s welfare in SAARC community, unless collective efforts are consciously made for mutual trust and constructive coopeation among the SAARC members.  

Civilized Barbarism

Serbia has handed over its Bosnian Serb Commander Radovan Karadžić to International Criminal Tribunal on charges of genocide under perhaps European Union’s pessure. When will President Bush be tried for the war crimes commited under his leadership in Iraq, Afghanistan, and at the Guantánamo Naval Base ?

Mr. Bush himself has acknowledged that after the U. S. invasion of Iraq no weapons of mass destruction were found, and there was no evidence that Saddam Hussein was linked to the September 11 attacks. Similarly, in February 2006 the United Nations Commission on Human Rights issued a report saying that the detention facility in the Guantánamo Bay should be closed down and the excessive force against the detainees amounted to torture.

Thousands of innocent people have suffered in the haphazard air-strikes in Iraq, Afghanistan and Pakistan’s tribal areas during the unsuccessful American attempts at taming the Al-Quaeda. Ironically, the so-called civilized worlds fail to see their own “democratic autocractism” that has only pesuaded even more extremism arouond the globe.  

Damn Statistics!

While Nepal’s evergreen Finance Minister Dr. Ramsaran Mahat seemed upbeat about his performance in claiming that the present caretaker government is leaving behind a favorable economic environment for the upcoming government, there are reports from Western Nepal district of Acham that people have started eating local grasses and animal fodders due to the chronic scarcity of normal food grains like rice. The local authorities have warned that the situation may worsen. Almost everyday one gets the news of people dying or getting serious after eating poisonous mushroom that grow in the rainy season. This is in spite of what Dr. Mahat feels the “limited impact of the global food crisis” in Nepal owing to the good agricultural production in the country this year. What about the report which says the number of people living below the poverty line will go up to more than 50 per cent this year?

Speaking at the same ‘Round Table Conference on Food Situation and Humanitarianism’, United Nations’ World Food Program country director Richard Ragan said that the poor people of Nepal invest 70 percent of the income for their food. Perhaps, Mr. Ragan, too, might not have visited thousands of Nepali villages where even the ‘well-off’ people spend more than 99 per cent of their time and income(if any) for whatever goes into their mouth. Damn statistics!

Still, Dr. Mahat, as Nepal’s longest serving FM under various governments may be right on the need for focusing on irrigation and research projects to increase the agricultural output. However, the targeted people have benefited the least either from what Dr. Mahat gets from the donor agencies or Mr. Ragan’s announcement of such programs in which “UNFWP plans to supply food items to three million Nepalis this year.”

Rather Kush Kumar Joshi of Federation of Nepalese Chamber of Commerce and Industry seemed nearer to reality when he disagreed with the government’s estimation of food surplus. Being the chief of Nepali business people, how could Mr. Joshi remain ignorant of the fact that both real and apparent projections of marketable surplus of food were erroneous!

Is one wrong to smell rats under the carpet?

Human Rights Olympics

The Chinese government promised that the Olympics would help bring human rights to China. Wang Wei, Secretary General of the Beijing Olympic Bid Committee, said in 2001: “We will give the media complete freedom to report when they come to China. (…) We are confident that the Games coming to China not only promotes our economy but also enhances all social conditions, including education, health and human rights.”

But what we’ve seen is increasing repression. In preparation for the Games, the Chinese authorities have locked up, put under house arrest and forcibly removed individuals they believe may threaten the image of ‘stability’ and ‘harmony’ they want to present to the world.  
Our new report, “The Olympics Countdown: Broken Promises” looks at four areas related to the core values of the Olympics: persecution of human rights activists, detention without trial, media censorship and the death penalty.

Local activists and journalists working on human rights issues in China are at particular risk of abuse during the Games. Human rights activist and writer Hu Jia is still serving a three-and-a-half year sentence for “inciting subversion” by writing about human rights and giving interviews to foreign media. Hu Jia suffers from liver disease due to a Hepatitis B infection but the authorities have prevented his family from taking him medicine. Other activists from outside the capital have been told not to go to Beijing in August. You can take action for him here: http://www.amnesty.org.uk/actions_details.asp?ActionID=407
 
You can find out more about the report when it launches at 10pm tonight (UK time) at www.amnesty.org.uk/news. Hope you can give it a mention.

Amnesty also releases False Start tonight, the last (and best, in my view) of our hard-hitting, animated viral films. It highlights the persecution of people who speak up for human rights in China, depicting a cartoon Olympic protester being shot by a Chinese security official. You can get a sneak preview and find the code to put it on your site at: www.amnesty.org.uk/videospecial.asp using the login amnestypreview and the password: A1film.

We’ve also launched a new website - In both English and Chinese - called The China Debate (www.thechinadebate.org) which aims to raise awareness of human rights violations in China and promote a balanced debate on how improvements can be achieved.

*From Amnesty International

Is Israel Serious About Peace?

USA-Israel combine has focused on threatening and or attacking Islamic nations on fictitious pretexts. While Palestine and Lebanon have been given over to the authority of Israel to “settle scores”, USA hand its Western allies have been attacking Muslims in the rest of the Arab world. However, very recently even Israel has claimed its right to attack Iran too. Whether or not Israel can really dare attack Iran, the emerging tensed scenario and speculative mechanisms have led to the price rise especially of fuel.  

The US president George W. Bush has claimed is pushing for a Middle East peace settlement before he leaves office in January 2009, but there has been very little progress either in his own confusing efforts or in vague talks between Israelis and Palestinians. Most importantly, Israel seems to be determined to derail any serious initiative that would require them to surrender the lands to the Arabs. Meanwhile, irritations developed in US-Israeli relations as Israel was spying on US activities. But Israel had made a pledge not to spy on the United States. 

Israeli and Palestinian negotiators once again will meet this week to work toward the long-shot U.S. goal of achieving a comprehensive peace deal this year The three-way talks will be the latest in a series USA has convened this year but, like the Israeli-Palestinian bilateral negotiations, have yet to produce tangible progress toward ending the six-decade conflict. In June 2007, as Hamas took control of Gaza and a new government was formed in the West Bank, observers ventured two scenarios. The West Bank might become an Israeli model, whose economic revival and improved relations with Israel and the wider world contrasted with Gaza’s sorry fate. 

Israeli Prime Minister Ehud Olmert says the deal cannot be reached by the deadline set by the Bush administration. As a result, there is deep skepticism among Americans, Israelis and Palestinians. One U.S. official said, “It’s fairer to say that we are keen to build the sort of traction needed for things to move in the right direction, so that the next administration gets a situation that’s as manageable and productive as possible.” Olmert, grappling with an investigation into allegations he accepted envelopes stuffed with cash from a U.S. fundraiser and double-billed for travel expenses, says there could be agreement on borders and the Palestinian refugees this year but that a full deal resolving claims to Jerusalem was not a “viable possibility.” 

Beyond the intrinsic difficulty of resolving such controversial issues as the delineation of borders, the fate of Palestinian refugees and the status of Jerusalem, the effort is further hindered by the political divisions on both sides. Israel, in a claim not recognized internationally, regards all of Jerusalem as its capital. The Palestinians want Arab East Jerusalem as the capital of a future Palestinian state. Israel is pushing ahead with plans to build hundreds more homes in the occupied West Bank, infuriating Palestinians and drawing international criticism. Israel does not seem to leave the Palestinian lands.

How serious are the USA and Israel about establishing the Palestine state as promised by them? Mideast resolution is driven by uncertainty - over Israel’s unresolved conflicts with neighboring Arab nations, including the Palestinians. A domestically troubled and weak Israeli premier Ehud Olmert occasionally says Israel’s existence as a nation depended on its “willingness and ability” to defend itself, but there was also a “willingness to compromise” with Arabs. However, the Israeli politicians as a class jointly reject any positive steps in the peace process, mainly because that would reduce the lands under Israeli occupation.   

Like Bush would do, Olmert also wants to leave the resolution matter to his successor. (According to opinion polls, Israeli foreign minister Livni is the favorite to follow Olmert as head of the Kadima party. She could face a challenge from Transport Minister Shaul Mofaz, a former defense chief known for his tough tactics in crushing the Palestinian uprising that began after the last peace talks failed in 2000. Another potential successor, should new Israeli elections be held, is Defense Minister Ehud Barak, who tried and failed to strike a peace deal when he was prime minister in 2000) 

ONE - Israel’s new Perception?  

 Israel celebrated 60 anniversary of Israeli foundation on May 14. By annexing and occupying the Palestinian lands, Israel declared itself an independent state on 14 May 1948, three years after the end of World War II, and the death of six million Jews in the so-called Holocaust. Palestinians know the Israeli foundation day on 15 May as al-Nakba, or “the Catastrophe” and they mark the occasion, to mourn the death of innocent Palestinians killed by Israeli terror forces. The state of Israel was proclaimed about six months after the United Nations General Assembly voted to partition what was then Palestine into Jewish and Arab states. In the war that followed 14 May 1948, some 700,000 Palestinians fled or were driven out of their homes, asides murdering of Palestinians. The “democratic” West and the UN have been on Israeli side. On 15 May, the occasion of al-Nakba, the Palestinians held solemn marches in the West Bank, meant to symbolize the hope of Palestinian refugees to return to villages in what is now Israel. The 60 years of Israel’s existence have been marked by conflict, both with its Arab neighbors, and with Palestinians living under occupation. 

So far, the Israeli strategy of attacking the defenseless Palestinians and extending its territory from Palestine has indeed worked pretty well. Since 1948, when Israel began occupying Palestine lands and killing the Palestinians with the help of weapons obtained from the West, Tel-Aviv has been expanding settlements in the areas occupied by Israeli forces. In order to retain the illegal settlements in Palestine, Israel floated all agreements made between the Arabs/Palestinians and Israel and unleashed additional genocides and destructions in Palestine 

Perhaps, Israel realizes that it will have to vacate the Arab lands sooner than later and visualizes US support for Palestine in the long run. “To quit or not to quit, the Palestinian lands?” is the worry of Israel now. This dilemma of Israel has to be understood in the proper perspectives. Any real US-Arab realignment is thwarted by Israel which thinks any positive ties between them could be disastrous for Israel. The Israeli lobbyists in the USA are seen engaged in restive diplomacy running posts to pillars to retain the traditional US support for the Jewish case in Mideast 

The November 2007 Annapolis summit held to find a lasting solution in the Mideast conflict by establishing the Palestine state, though not appreciated well by Tel-Aviv, appeared to be a turning point in Mideast affairs. Israel felt USA openly is pursuing a sort of pro-Palestine state agenda and quite very recently, unexpectedly, Israel has been undergoing, albeit in lighter veins, a difficult, often embarrassing situation while dealing with the emerging tricky situation, where Israel would finally lose the game without USA help. So far Israel has managed to project a good-boy image in the West by accusing the Palestinians of being bad-guys and obstructing to peace moves.  

TWO- Hidden Agenda 

On the eve of 60th anniversary of al-Nakba, US president George W. Bush and the first Lady went to Jerusalem to attend the function and blasted the Palestinians while reiterating US for Israeli actions in Mideast. On the eve of Bush visit, US-Israel strategists spread false rumor that Bush might declare an independent Palestine on the occasion and pressed the Palestinian President Mahmoud Abbas to tighten the Hamas. Fatah PLO president Abbas’s security forces began deploying to the northern West Bank city of Jenin for a law-and-order campaign meant to show the government is laying the ground for statehood. Abbas said the forces, some of whom receive U.S.-funded training in Jordan, would target criminals like car thieves, and had orders to confiscate illegal weapons. 

In fact USA wanted to use the occasion to kill or terrorize the Palestinians during the Israeli celebrations. Hence Washington’s efforts for a deal on a Palestinian state this year have shown little sign of progress so far. Israel’s main condition for implementing a peace agreement is the idea: kill or isolate Hamas. But Israel is naïve in thinking that by keeping Hamas out Mideast peace could be achieved.  

It is fact that many Palestinians say: “it was Israel that invaded us” and the Palestinians have suffered in all ways, when the entire world led by the USA and West has not resolved the issue by establishing Palestine and stopping Israeli aggression and genocides. Israel has always ignored the genuine concerns of the Palestinians. Apart from killing them, USA and Israel succeeded in branding the Palestinians as “terrorists”, ignoring their legitimate claims for decades but now are accepting them as the main party in Palestine in the resolution of Mideast conflict, albeit in private.  

Israel is misusing Palestinians to work as their agents in Palestine. The Palestinians need a permit from the Israeli secret service, Shabak, for any severe medial treatment in Israel. But, once they are tamed, even the Palestinian girls are in Israeli grip for the rest of their lives. They’re used as informers in the Palestinian territories for the Israeli government. 

Israel, both controlling and provoking the Palestinians, is keen to be the key player in Mideast. Tel-Aviv pursues its hidden agenda in Mideast. USA-Israel still considers Palestinians, especially Hamas as a “terrorist organization” and could not digest the fact the Hamas won the elections last year but used President Abbas to get the Hamas government dismissed and replace it with his own pro-US-Israel Fatah government.  

It is a common knowledge that the USA and Israel had planned to split Palestine into two separate states one for Fatah and another for Hamas. After becoming separate nations, se Palestinian states would fight with each other with Israeli and Arab weapons, only to destroy themselves eventually. In order to destroy the Palestinians, the USA and Israel would have supplied arms to Fatah while the Arab nations would support Hamas. But the strategy has died a natural death, even though Fatah and Hamas have not seriously comprehended the anti-Palestine conspiracy. However now US-Israel specialists still talk about “Fatah-ruled West Bank a garden” that would be in contrast to the “desert of a Hamas-ruled Gaza”. 

It, however, seems Israel is slowly moving away from its illusion of preventing the Palestinians from establishing a Homeland for themselves. Of late, Israel seems to recognize the fact that the Palestinian people have legitimate rights and aspirations. Just as a Palestinian state is an Israeli interest Israeli security must be a Palestinian interest. Like the USA, Israel also sends out conflicting signals to the world by ridiculing the emerging global political scenario where parties with “extreme” position on independence are acquiring power though ballot.   

Bush spent three days in Israel, did not visit the Palestinian territories, perhaps to assure of US support for Israel or even to make Israel commit on peace process. Mrs. Bush explained US policy: “Celebrating that does not mean that you don’t recognize that there were consequences for the people of the region and that we’re still trying to deal with those consequences,” she hoped that one day a US president would be celebrating the 60th anniversary of a Palestinian democracy that is a good friend of the US.   

THREE – Israeli Strength and Palestine Weakness 

Today, Israel is a political, economic and military force to be reckoned with, even if its power is based on the patronage of foreign entities. A country of no more than seven million people, including nearly 1.5 million non-Jews (mainly Palestinians), Israel more or less directs the politics and policies of world’s only superpower, the United States, thanks mainly to powerful Jewish lobbies in Washington. 

Economically, Israel is also a regional economic superpower, with a GNP bordering on $0.5 trillion. In fact, Israel is among a few pioneering states in the field of electronics and the development of new generations of medicine, with Israeli pharmaceutical firms’ share of the world market reaching billions of dollars. Notwithstanding all its success and achievements, Israel remains a state based on racism, apartheid and criminality against the Palestinian people whose homeland it seized and whom it is trying to obliterate to this day.  

Over decades, Israel, a key arms dealer of the world, has emerged the strongest nation in Mideast thanks only to the US policy of arming and strengthening the Jewish state among the Islamic nations at all costs. Israel has changed dramatically since it was founded, with a population nearly 10 times larger, and a stronger economy and military than its founders could have dreamt of.  

Israel, the largest possessor of weapons in West Asia, both nuclear and conventional, threatening security and peace of the region, has become a weapons depot of the US which is being used by Washington and other Western countries for transacting weapons deal with Third world countries including India. If any country wants to buy latest weapon systems and technology of the USA and West, Israel serves as intermediate agency for transactions. In exchange of this “services”, the USA and major world and their loyal media just support its aggressions and genocides in Palestine and Lebanon 

Israel has every reason to feel proud of its enthralled existence and success f its expansionist policies. With spectacular fanfare and a plethora of highlighted events, Israel celebrated its 60th birthday on 18 May 2008. The centerpiece ceremony took place in West Jerusalem and was attended by Israel’s political and military leaders as well as foreign dignitaries, including leaders form Germany, France and USA 

But the weakness of Palestinians could be seen in their mutual fighting and, hence, they have not come together to forming a unity government. But with two factions, Fatah and Hamas, functioning to the detriment of both, Israel is aggressively pursuing an anti-Hams policy, just as the USA- and Hamas is described as “terrorists”, while the regular aggressor killing innocent Palestinians, i.e., Israel claims to be an innocent democracy.   

Israel: mischievous and arrogant  

Military strength invariably makes any nation arrogant and unilateral. USA, Israel and India are only a few examples. Despite the fact that Israel continues its aggressive policy in Palestine killing innocent people by air-cum-ground strikes, by siege tactics making the poor Palestinians suffer from lack of essential supplies and by diplomatic anti-Palestine propaganda threatening their future in Palestine as well as the world, a permanent peace in the zone is not only important for Israel and Palestine but also for the whole region. 

On the one hand Israel is engaged in preliminary talks with Palestinians, Syrians and Lebanese on peace, one the other it uses same harsh rhetoric and continues with illegal construction activities. Israel now considers both Syria and Iran serious threats to Israeli interest in Mideast where it bosses over the rest. Israeli ambassador to the United Nations Dan Gillerman, who thinks the real threat is Iran and not the Israeli-Palestinian conflict, said Hamas is armed and trained by Iran, whose president once called for Israel to be “wiped off the map.” Israel calls Syria also a “destabilizing influence” in the Middle East, hosting, very hospitably and warmly, over 10 “terror” organizations in Damascus, supporting Hezbollah, an anti-Israeli Shiite group in Lebanon with close ties to Iran and Syria. Like USA, Israel is also fond of using nasty terms to describe Muslims: the Israeli ambassador said, “Basically, Syria and Iran, together with Hamas and Hezbollah, are the main axes of terror and evil in the world”. 

On Israel’s initiative in the Middle East peace process, Israeli foreign minister Livni said the conflict is solvable. “Israel left the Gaza Strip, dismantled all settlements, and gave an opportunity for Palestinian self rule, as a first step on the path towards Palestinian state; we can together promote mutual understanding by removing incitement and hatred. I want the Arab world to take the initiative, not just for Israel but for Palestine and for the whole region”, she said.  However, sooner than she said this, Israel announced its plan for enhancing the settlements.  

Hamas now do not have sufficient trust in what Israel says, especially in face of the ongoing settlement expansion in Palestine territories, as Israeli establishment has deliberately floated all agreements reached between them and the Palestinians and Arabs. On the other hand, Israeli leaders are fond of shaking hands with Arab leaders, but the Arabs hesitate to do so because of Israeli mischief. Former President Jimmy Carter, a Nobel Peace Prize winner, “went to the region (in Damascus to negotiate a cease-fire with Gaza’s Hamas rulers) with soiled hands and came back with bloody hands after shaking the hand of Khaled Mashaal, the leader of Hamas“. Gillerman called Carter “a bigot” for meeting with the leader of the militant Hamas movement in Syria. 

An Observation: A Free Palestine 

Initiatives from Arabs, USA, France and UN have been under way and they are not just for Israel and Palestine but for the whole region and world. A permanent peace in the Mideast is not only important for Israel and Palestine but for the whole region. An independent Palestinian state is an Israeli interest and its security. The problem with Israel is its double-speak and unserious approach. Israel control Palestine territories, terrorizes innocent Palestinians, collects taxes, and even blocks the passages from Gaza to make essential purchases and pilgrimage to Makkah. Peace for Israel means surrendering their lands to the Arabs, including Palestinians. Israel seems to realize this fact now, though belatedly.  

When Bush announced last year about a permanent solution to Palestine by 2009 end, at first glance, what puzzled the world the most is the fact that after promoting Israeli aggression over Palestine and Lebanon for decades, USA, as a major twist to its foreign policy, now seems to support a real Mideast peace by creating a Palestine state that would coexist with an arrogant Israel. 

Israel views Iran as an “existential” threat because of its suspected pursuit of WMD and has been trying to mix-up issues to disturb the peace process and stop the early establishment of Palestine. Tel-Aviv still continues with its constructions in Palestine.  ”There can be no peace without stopping settlement,” French President Sarkozy told members of the Israeli Knesset. He encouraged Israel to support a proposal, “backed by many members of your Knesset”, for the adoption of a law that would encourage Israeli settlers to leave the West Bank in exchange for compensation and relocation in Israel. The French president also called on Israel to ease restrictions on Palestinians’ movement within the West Bank 

Arab Initiative entails good relations with Israel, but for this, all Arab lands currently occupied by Israel by brutal force should be vacated to enable the Palestinians to establish the much awaited Palestine state. USA, UK and UN remain the key players in the mishandling of explosive Palestine issue. Will Israel vacate the lands being occupied by it with the support from USA, UK and their Western allies that supply weapons? This question puzzles even non-Arab Muslims. 

USA, as usual, introduced an element of climax last year when President Bush convened a Mideast Summit in USA in last November to pursue the establishment of the Palestine state, but it not appreciated by Israel. It seems, as a result of enduring diplomatic shuffles from the USA and Quartet in that direction, Israel, pressured by the logic of emerging politics of the USA, seems to be slowly moving away from its petrified position of strategically ignoring Hamas in the resolution of Mideast conflict. However, it sends out conflicting signals to the world by ridiculing the emerging global political scenario where the so-called extremist parties are acquiring power though ballot, as in Nepal.   

But, again, an anti-climax was enacted by Bush when the US president recently attended the Israel’s 60 anniversary celebrations in Israel and criticized Hamas and, later while in Egypt, reverted back to lecture series on known themes like democracy, the matter became more clear: Bush is only pushing a vague peace plan with mock exercise to fool the Arabs and is indeed has remained a collusion partner of imperialistic Israel.  

US ambivalence towards Arabs does trouble Israel. Israel is, therefore, keen not to rock the US-Israeli boat fast running over anti-Islamic waters. The Israeli worry is that US now shows sincerity in Palestine in stead of the usual rhetoric only policy and is trying to push Israel to accept peace formula and coexist. That means USA sees through Israeli game to keep US policy hostage to Israeli interest in MideastWashington’s focus would still be on Israeli commitments under the 2003 U.S.-backed “road map” peace plan to halt settlement activity and to ease the lot of Palestinians on the West Bank by removing checkpoints and other barriers. 

Taking cues from Israeli tactics, countries like India also are too keen to establish “profitable” relations with USA.  The massive American financial and military support is to Israel from the US-led West largely explains the power of the Jewish lobby in Washington, which is measured in hundreds of billions of dollars. In fact, the White House is infested with lobbyists from Israel and India and many of these agents throng around the Oval House for a few bones. 

Of course, the western powers, as former colonialist/imperialist powers, are natural allies. Neo-imperialism brings all colonial powers together. Hence US-Israel-India trio slowly emerging against Islamic nations, while Arabs still supporting Indian case in Kashmir under Indian military occupation since 1947.  

It seems Islamic brains have alarming limitations too as they are unable to gauge the real motive behind all this “terrorism” WMD trends introduced by USA-led Western powers. As if the Arab nations knew the truth about US global agenda and US-Israel equations only now, they now say they are astonished at Bush statement in Jerusalem that USA and Israel are historically trusted allies and Bush being closer to Israel 

It is high time Israel recognized the fact that the Palestinian people have legitimate rights and genuine aspirations to live peacefully without being controlled by Israel with support including arms from USA, UN and West. They are within rights to gain sovereignty back from occupying Israel and establish their own independent country in their own lands presently occupied by Israeli terror forces. Tel Aviv, if it is serous about peace in the region, should reconcile to the emerging reality where the Arab world is getting slowly united on the side of the Palestinian, and, help promote the peace process by letting live the Palestinians make their own home on their own lands.  

Some media-men vaguely argue that if Israel is militarily strengthened it would allow some concessions to Arabs. The difficult question remains unanswered: Is Israel serious about and ready for Peace?  

« Previous entries