Analysts say black women are more engaged and hold tremendous power in selecting the Democratic nominee.
Americans may have their own domestic reasons.
An outsider is more concerned with the foreign policy.
Will there be corresponding reformation in the existing ‘One-World’ policy with the historic change in American presidency?
If yes, who’d be more influential - Barrack or Hillary?
Barrack sounds original, fresh, & visionary.
But he appears straight from the Oscars than a real life politician.
He shuns racial & gender calls - and yet Americans are no less rascist than the Africans or Europeans.
Nor are they less dogmatic than the jihadis or ‘Fatwa-cians.’
Hillary pretends an I-Know-All air.
She’s received too much exposure since the Bill Era.
And she seems to be leaning more on her gender than on other political assets.
Then who’d be an ideal US president for a non-Western commoner?
Of course, Obama inspires a promising future.
And yet, Hillary would be more effective,…perhaps.
</a
human rights
